ADR-0000: [Short Title of the Decision]¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Status | Proposed |
| Date | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Authors | Spector Maintainers & Architecture Working Group |
| Deciders | Spector Technical Steering Committee (TSC) |
| Supersedes | None |
| Superseded By | None |
| Last Verified | YYYY-MM-DD |
1. Context¶
[Describe the context and background leading to this architectural decision. What is the current architecture, what changed in requirements or environment, and why is this decision needed now?]
2. Problem Statement¶
[Clearly define the architectural problem or technical challenge being addressed. Include technical constraints, performance bottlenecks, concurrency issues, or architectural friction.]
3. Decision Drivers¶
- [Driver 1: e.g., Zero-GC memory allocation under Panama FFM]
- [Driver 2: e.g., Sub-millisecond latency for real-time cognitive recall]
- [Driver 3: e.g., Modular decoupling between mathematical kernels and storage]
- [Driver 4: e.g., Thread-safe multi-tenant isolation and sticky sharding]
4. Considered Options¶
Option 1: [Option Name]¶
- Description: [Brief description of the approach]
- Advantages: [Key strengths]
- Disadvantages: [Key weaknesses]
Option 2: [Option Name]¶
- Description: [Brief description of the approach]
- Advantages: [Key strengths]
- Disadvantages: [Key weaknesses]
Option 3: [Option Name]¶
- Description: [Brief description of the approach]
- Advantages: [Key strengths]
- Disadvantages: [Key weaknesses]
5. Decision Outcome¶
Chosen Option: [Option X: Name of Selected Option]
[Explain why this option was selected over the alternatives. Summarize the architectural consensus, mathematical justification, or benchmark evidence supporting this choice.]
Positive Consequences¶
- [Positive consequence 1]
- [Positive consequence 2]
Negative Consequences & Trade-offs¶
- [Trade-off or additional operational complexity 1]
- [Trade-off 2]
6. Pros and Cons of the Options¶
| Option | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Option 1 | ... | ... |
| Option 2 | ... | ... |
| Option 3 | ... | ... |
7. Implementation Plan¶
- Phase 1: [Definition of SPIs, data structures, and Panama FFM layouts]
- Phase 2: [Core implementation in designated reactor modules]
- Phase 3: [Property-based tests, micro-benchmarks, and integration test suites]
- Phase 4: [Documentation update, deprecation notices, and migration path]
8. Code Reference & Verification¶
- Primary Module(s):
[e.g., memory/spector-kernel, nucleus/spector-core] - Key Packages:
[e.g., com.spectrayan.spector.kernel.layout] - Classes:
[e.g., EncodingHeaderLayout.java, StrengthLayout.java] - Verification Tests:
[e.g., EncodingHeaderLayoutTest.java]